Vigilantism

by Jeff on January 12, 2012 · 2 comments

in Things I Hate

New York Times Public Editor Arthur S. Brisbane blogs today:

I’m looking for reader input on whether and when New York Times news reporters should challenge “facts” that are asserted by newsmakers they write about.

1. Yes.

2. Fuck you.

 

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

theothererin January 12, 2012 at 2:33 pm

Once again, in three words, you manage to secure your place in the Human Being Hall of Fame.

Natasha January 16, 2012 at 4:52 pm

I think this excerpt from a follow-up post is worth noting:

“First, though, I must lament that “truth vigilante” generated way more heat than light. A large majority of respondents weighed in with, yes, you moron, The Times should check facts and print the truth.

“That was not the question I was trying to ask. My inquiry related to whether The Times, in the text of news columns, should more aggressively rebut “facts” that are offered by newsmakers when those “facts” are in question. I consider this a difficult question, not an obvious one.”

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: